Skip to content
+27(0)11 553 7264
|
info@sapvia.co.za
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Pinterest
Search for:
about us
our organisation
working groups
job opportunities
membership
members directory
become a member
membership renewal form
member benefits
pv initiatives
events
news & resources
NERSA registered plants dashboard
contact us
members area
full / associate members
pv professionals
Search for:
IPPO Questionnaire – Feedback on BW5 and BW6 with a view to BW7
IPPO Questionnaire – Feedback on BW5 and BW6 with a view to BW7
gayle@cubefivestudio.com
2022-12-08T10:11:43+02:00
1. Select affiliation
*
SAPVIA
SAWEA
SAPVIA and SAWEA
2. Technology of your projects
*
Solar PV
Wind
Solar PV and Wind
3. Are you satisfied with the current RFP documents?
*
Yes
No
Comment
4. Are you satisfied with the current bid submission process?
*
Yes
No
Comment
5. Would you welcome an electronic submission process?
*
Yes
No
Comment
6. Would an electronic submission process be trusted?
*
Yes
No
Comment
7. Would an alternative bid submission centre be encouraged? If so, please indicate your preferred location in the comment block below.
*
Yes
No
Comment
8. Was BW6 submission process more onerous or less onerous compared to BW5 and earlier bid windows?
*
More onerous
Less onerous
Comment
9. Do you feel that the uncertainty levels in the bidding process in respect of timelines, technical requirements, deadlines and RFP documents in BW6 have increased or decreased compared to BW5 and earlier bid windows?
*
Increased
Decreased
Comment
10. Rate the level of enforcement of the RFP criteria at bid submission stage and IA/PPA signing?
*
1. no enforcement
2. minimal enforcement
3. neutral
4. acceptable enforcement
5. total enforcement
Comment
11. On a scale of 1 to 5, what is the likelihood that you would meet local content demands as set out in the BW6 RFP?
*
1. no likelihood at all
2. not likely
3. neutral
4. likely
5. extremely likely
Comment
12. On a scale of 1 to 5, what is the likelihood of reaching financial close with the current local content requirements as set out in the BW6 RFP?
*
1. no likelihood at all
2. not likely
3. neutral
4. likely
5. extremely likely
Comment
13. On a scale of 1 to 5, what is the likelihood of local manufacturers meeting the demand due to the local content requirements?
*
1. no likelihood at all
2. not likely
3. neutral
4. likely
5. extremely likely
Comment
14. Did the bidders’ conference adequately clear up any questions or uncertainties in the RFP and technical requirements?
*
Yes
No
Comment
15. Are Ancillary Services technical requirements detailed and clear enough to be actionable?
*
16. Are forecasting requirements detailed and clear enough to be actionable?
*
17. Would you participate in future REIPPPP bid windows In its current form?
*
Yes
No
Comment
18. Do you have additional comments or recommendation for a better experience with the IPPO?
*
19. What are the aspects of the current REIPPPP process, BW5 and BW6 that need to be applauded and/or retained in BW7?
*
Verification
Please enter any two digits
Example: 12
This box is for spam protection -
please leave it blank
Page load link
Go to Top